Skip to content
eventVerified

Phidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s

In the late 430s Phidias and others of Pericles’ circle were prosecuted in stories of embezzlement and impiety. The dated judicial attack is not the 430 fine of Pericles and not the Parthenon as fabric. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.

Read the full account

In the late 430s Phidias and others of Pericles’ circle were prosecuted in stories of embezzlement and impiety. The dated judicial attack is not the 430 fine of Pericles and not the Parthenon as fabric. Pericles’s documented role is: Later lives report prosecutions of Phidias, and attacks on Aspasia and Anaxagoras, as strikes at Pericles. Courts sat; he was the political target; unique charge-sheets are thin. Circle-prosecutions are a different instrument. Later editors, printers, and excavators remain named where they appear.

Context

Ivory-and-gold accounting, unnamed jurors, and later comic poets already structure the file. A circle-trial is not unique authorship of Athena’s statue. Medium confidence is stated because later lives conflate years. Named others on the file: Phidias, Aspasia, Anaxagoras as neighbouring targets, unnamed jurors, and later Plutarch share the heading. The public setting is the file around -0438-01-01. The instrument stays Phidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s. The setting of Phidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s is the public file around -0438-01-01. Driver justice-judicial-independence-erosion is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Why it matters

Medium confidence on unique charge-sheets. Welfare reading worsening. The attached mechanism is A dated judicial attack on the building-and-household circle polarised late-430s Athens as a justice heading. Lag to any modern indicator is not treated as zero. This path is attached because the mechanism is named from this act, not because a driver list needed coverage. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.

Shared responsibility is part of Phidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s. Naming Pericles does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from -0438-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Pericles

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.36 · verified

    Later lives report prosecutions of Phidias, and attacks on Aspasia and Anaxagoras, as strikes at Pericles. Courts sat; he was the political target; unique charge-sheets are thin.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Britannica — Phidias, accusationEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Britannica — PericlesEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Britannica independently records prosecutions around Phidias/Aspasia as a late-430s Periclean file. Official: Britannica — Pericles, attacks on Phidias and Aspasia (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pericles-Athenian-statesman (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent: Britannica — Phidias, accusation (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Phidias (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica). The two URLs are different pages. Where the carrier is a later edition or a received narrative, that limit is stated rather than upgraded to an autograph. Official carrier: Britannica — Pericles, attacks on Phidias and Aspasia (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pericles-Athenian-statesman (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent carrier: Britannica — Phidias, accusation (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Phidias (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica).

Established: a received late-430s prosecution file around Phidias and the household. Not established: a unique stenograph of every charge. Established: a sourced public record of Phidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s under -0438-01-01.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Mixed effects of Phidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s are separate paths.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorPericles
  2. contributed toFactPhidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s
  3. strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
  4. strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Phidias and members of Pericles’ circle are prosecuted in the late 430s. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/per-phidias-trial-438

https://factrail.ai/facts/per-phidias-trial-438

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.