Skip to content
Plutarch

Plutarch

0

Near balanceFormula-derived score

Greek biographer and Delphic priest (conventional c.46–after 119 CE) whose Parallel Lives and Moralia reach the public through Perrin and Babbitt Loebs. Documented harms: lives as if registers; uncertain chronology printed as diary; Antony–Cleopatra as later Eastern heading; silence on slave property. Date the Loeb, not invented composition years.

Middle-Platonist moral biography as later printed English rather than as a civil registerDelphic priesthood as a later sanctuary caption not as a recovered diplomaparallel pairing of Greek and Roman lives as a school method he did not typeset

Impact

Not rated yet: the verified records linked to this person, without a numeric impact.

Editorial assessment (context, not the score)

The page is not a Chaeronea diary and not a unique year for each pair. The heaviest documented costs in public English are Lives-as-register, fortune-king Alexander, Antony’s Eastern heading, chronology printed as certainty, war lives without bodies, and silence on slave property. The offsets are real and mostly late: Perrin 1914, Babbitt 1927, Perseus, SEP/IEP flags, and UNESCO Delphi 1987. He did not file 1914 or 1987. Editors and ministries did that work. Confidence is high on those pages, medium on flatterer-literacy and fear-reduction, low on any unique coefficient from a pair to a modern series.

Indicators affected

Indicators this person’s verified facts reach. No score contribution is assigned; the observed state is the indicator’s own reading.

Accountability & contradictions

Claims against the record, the type of responsibility, and what is disputed.

What could change this assessment

  • 4 linked facts have no assessed welfare direction yet.
  • Lifetime coverage has not been assessed: the record reflects stored facts only (0050–0120).

Causal path

Person → Fact → Driver → Indicator. Select a path to inspect its factors; the full network opens on demand.

Timeline

The most relevant dated facts, newest first.

Evidence & methodology

How the record is sourced and how the score is derived.

30 of 30 linked facts verified, drawing on 6 distinct sources (0050–0120).

Sources include Encyclopaedia Britannica, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Perseus Digital Library / Tufts, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Sources

  1. 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Plutarch, religionStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  2. 2.Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — PlutarchInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  3. 3.Britannica — PlutarchEncyclopaedia Britannica
  4. 4.Perseus — Plutarch, Alexander (later English)Perseus Digital Library / Tufts
  5. 5.Britannica — Parallel LivesEncyclopaedia Britannica
  6. 6.Perseus — Plutarch, On the Malice of HerodotusPerseus Digital Library / Tufts

The score is formula-derived (Factrail formula v1, version 1.0.0), not an editorial verdict. Read the methodology.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 6

Expert analysis

An excerpt; the full analysis opens on request.

The first fact about Plutarch in a public catalog is a later book, not a recovered Chaeronea diary. Perrin’s Loeb Lives (https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674990524 (opens in a new tab) and https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674991101 (opens in a new tab)) and Babbitt’s Moralia I (https://www.loebclassics.com/view/LCL197/1927/volume.xml (opens in a new tab)) are the dated English. Archive scans at https://archive.org/details/plutarchslives01plutuoft (opens in a new tab) and https://archive.org/details/plutarchs-moralia-vol.-1-loeb-197 (opens in a new tab) are free files. Perseus Alexander (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0129 (opens in a new tab)), Caesar (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0130 (opens in a new tab)), Antony (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0007 (opens in a new tab)), and Cicero (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0016 (opens in a new tab)) are public HTML. Stanford at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plutarch/ (opens in a new tab) and IEP at https://iep.utm.edu/plutarch/ (opens in a new tab) flag genre, chronology, and Delphi. Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Plutarch (opens in a new tab) and Parallel Lives at https://www.britannica.com/topic/Parallel-Lives (opens in a new tab) mark a remainder corpus and moral biography. Antony’s Cleopatra is a later English heading, not an Alexandrian register. Lycurgus is mixed legend. Slave property is not abolished in the printed file. War lives (Alexander/Caesar) are ethics without a casualty table. Isis and Osiris in Loeb (https://www.loebclassics.com/view/LCL306/1936/volume.xml (opens in a new tab)) is antiquarian religion, later occult-captioned. How to Tell a Flatterer (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plut.+Mor.+48e (opens in a new tab)) can train favour as easily as it names it. The offsets are URLs with later dates. UNESCO Delphi at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/393/ (opens in a new tab) (1987) conserves the sanctuary landscape of the later priest-caption. Hellenic culture portal at https://www.culture.gov.gr/en/SitePages/default.aspx (opens in a new tab) and Greek UNESCO monuments at https://www.greekunescomonuments.gr/en/monument/archaeological-site-of-delphi/ (opens in a new tab) are public site doors. Cambridge companion neighbourhood at https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-plutarch/ (opens in a new tab) is a classroom file. British Library Greek manuscripts at https://www.bl.uk/greek-manuscripts (opens in a new tab) are the medieval path. Archive Moralia vol. 3 at https://archive.org/details/plutarchs-moralia-vol.-3-loeb-245 (opens in a new tab) is another free carrier. What the score must not say: that he legislated Sparta; that 1914 is a unique composition year; that a Delphi ticket is a priesthood diploma; that Antony is a unique harm coefficient for Egypt; that On Superstition staffed a hospital; that lost pairs are hereby restored. Complex contribution is the honest type. Confidence is high on editions and listings, medium on flatterer-literacy and fear-reduction signs, low on unique modern indicator coefficients. 1914 is not 100. 1987 is not a Delphic diploma. Hostile vita slander is not upgraded. Off-family indicator padding is refused. Related people are Cleopatra as later Antony English, Cicero as a printed pair, Herodotus as a historiography neighbour, Epicurus as a later Moralia opponent-heading, Alexander and Caesar as Loeb pairs, Plato as school ancestry, Socrates as a Moralia interlocutor-heading, Lycurgus as a mixed Life, Antony as a pair, Suetonius as a later Latin lives neighbour. The useful question is which later public pages still move knowledge, polarisation, and civic staffing under this name without inventing Chaeronea mornings.

Parallel Lives was an argument through comparison

Plutarch wrote during the late first and early second centuries CE, when Greece was firmly inside the Roman imperial world. His Parallel Lives pairs Greek and Roman statesmen and commanders not to produce modern archival biography but to compare character through action. The Alexander–Caesar pairing is one of the most influential examples: military conquest, ambition, clemency, anger and political power become material for moral judgment. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (opens in a new tab) emphasizes that Plutarch was a Platonist philosopher as well as a biographer, and that ethical formation runs through his writings. That matters for how the Lives should be read. Anecdotes are selected because they reveal character, not because every detail can be treated as independently verified modern history. Plutarch's method therefore shaped later political memory while also requiring source caution: his biographies preserve traditions about Alexander, Caesar and others, but their organizing purpose is ethical comparison rather than neutral chronicle.

The Moralia widened ethics beyond famous rulers

Plutarch's Moralia shows the same ethical project applied to ordinary conduct, education, religion and even human treatment of animals. In essays on anger he treats rage as a condition that distorts judgment and damages relationships, while works such as On the Cleverness of Animals question a simple human monopoly on reason. The Stanford entry (opens in a new tab) situates these writings within Middle Platonism and Plutarch's wider concern with the rational governance of passions. He was also a priest at Delphi and held civic responsibilities at Chaeronea, so the philosophical work was connected to institutions rather than written in isolation. Plutarch died sometime after 119 CE. His lasting influence comes from this combination: famous historical figures supplied case studies of power and character, while the essays supplied a vocabulary for self-command and moral education. The result is a corpus that shaped Renaissance and early modern readers not because it offered a single political theory, but because it made conduct observable through named events, decisions and personal habits.

Dispute a fact on this pageNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.