Skip to content
statementVerified

On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint

A dialogue defends late and inherited punishment. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.

Read the full account

A dialogue defends late and inherited punishment. Plutarch’s documented role is: He wrote the theodicy dialogue. Inherited punishment is the cost teaching. Later editors, printers, and excavators remain named where they appear. Plutarch's documented role is: He wrote the theodicy dialogue.

Context

Middle-Platonic theodicy. Children of the wicked appear as examples. Named others on the file: Literary speakers. The public setting is the file around 0115-06-01. The instrument stays On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint. The setting of On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint is the public file around 0115-06-01. Driver justice-judicial-independence-erosion is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

Why it matters

Justice as delayed taint. Welfare reading worsening. The attached mechanism is A public defence of delayed and inherited divine punishment is a justice path. Lag to any modern indicator is not treated as zero. This path is attached because the mechanism is named from this act, not because a driver list needed coverage. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Mixed effects of On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint are separate paths.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Plutarch

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.4 · verified

    He wrote the theodicy dialogue. Inherited punishment is the cost teaching.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — PlutarchInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Plutarch, religionStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

SEP/IEP independently discuss De sera numinis vindicta. Official: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Plutarch, providence (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plutarch/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Plutarch, De sera numinis vindicta (https://iep.utm.edu/plutarch/ (opens in a new tab); Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). The two URLs are different pages. Where the carrier is a later edition or a received narrative, that limit is stated rather than upgraded to an autograph. Official carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Plutarch, providence (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plutarch/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent carrier: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Plutarch, De sera numinis vindicta (https://iep.utm.edu/plutarch/ (opens in a new tab); Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

Theology essay, not a court. Established: a sourced public record of On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint under 0115-06-01.

Shared responsibility is part of On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint. Naming Plutarch does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 0115-06-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorPlutarch
  2. contributed toFactOn the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint
  3. strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
  4. strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). On the Delays of the Divine Vengeance publicly defends late punishment of the wicked, including inherited taint. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/plu-sera-numinis

https://factrail.ai/facts/plu-sera-numinis

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.