Calumny of Apelles is completed in the mid-1490s as an allegory of unjust accusation, later in the Uffizi
1494–97; Vasari says gift to Antonio Segni. Alberti’s description of Apelles’ allegory is the literary source. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
Context
Shared Alberti/humanist source remains. Savonarolan Florence is context, not tape of the commission.
Sandro Botticelli’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.
Conventional dating c. 1494–97; Vasari says gift to Antonio Segni. Alberti’s description of Apelles’ allegory is the literary source. Florence after 1494 is a climate of faction and denunciation — neighbouring context, not proven commission politics.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Sandro Botticelli
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.4 · verified
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactCalumny of Apelles is completed in the mid-1490s as an allegory of unjust accusation, later in the Uffizi
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.5 · Effect from 1 January 1495 · verified
- Worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.36 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.35 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.34 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.15 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Uffizi — Botticelli, Calumny of ApellesGallerie degli Uffizi · High credibility · verified
- 2.Britannica — Sandro BotticelliEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Uffizi and Britannica independently place Calumny in the 1490s oeuvre.
Sandro Botticelli did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act. Split from Pazzi pittura.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorSandro Botticelli
- contributed toFactCalumny of Apelles is completed in the mid-1490s as an allegory of unjust accusation, later in the Uffizi
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Calumny of Apelles is completed in the mid-1490s as an allegory of unjust accusation, later in the Uffizi. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/sb-calumny-apelles
https://factrail.ai/facts/sb-calumny-apelles
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.