Annals 1–6 narrate Tiberius’s maiestas prosecutions and Sejanus’s rise and fall as an informing machine
In the Tiberian Annals Tacitus writes a system of maiestas charges, rewards for accusers, the rise of Aelius Sejanus, the destruction of Agrippina’s branch, and the 31 fall. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
In the Tiberian Annals Tacitus writes a system of maiestas charges, rewards for accusers, the rise of Aelius Sejanus, the destruction of Agrippina’s branch, and the 31 fall. He did not prosecute under Tiberius. The colour is famously hostile; that is a source limit, not a reason to drop the machine he describes. Archival locator: Perseus — Tacitus, Annals (English) at https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0078 (opens in a new tab) (Perseus Digital Library / Tufts). Independent locator: Britannica — Tacitus at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tacitus-Roman-historian (opens in a new tab) (Encyclopaedia Britannica).
Context
Capri withdrawal and the Senate’s fear are part of the same file. Levick-style modern cautions against villa-gossip are stored as not-unique-proof, not as a delete key.
Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Mixed effects of Annals 1–6 narrate Tiberius’s maiestas prosecutions and Sejanus’s rise and fall as an informing machine are separate paths.
Why it matters
A school history of treason-informing is a justice path. High confidence on the existence of trials; medium on motives he ascribes. Later ‘Tiberian tyranny’ posters are mixed reception.
That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Tacitus
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.4 · verified
He wrote the Tiberian books. Delatores, the Senate, and the emperor acted. Complex; he was not in that Senate.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactAnnals 1–6 narrate Tiberius’s maiestas prosecutions and Sejanus’s rise and fall as an informing machine
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.45 · Effect from 1 January 116 · verified
- Worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.32 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.32 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.31 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Britannica — TacitusEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
- 2.Perseus — Tacitus, AnnalsPerseus Digital Library / Tufts · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Perseus Annals English of books 1–6 and Latin Library Annals 1 are public. Britannica’s Tacitus and Tiberius articles independently treat maiestas and Sejanus as his great Tiberian themes. LacusCurtius faces the English. No 31 CE gazette is recovered here.
Established: the Tiberian maiestas-Sejanus narrative as his. Not established: a unique indictment list complete from his pages, or that every innuendo is proven. Conventional Annals date. Not a 17th-century Tacitist pamphlet.
Shared responsibility is part of Annals 1–6 narrate Tiberius’s maiestas prosecutions and Sejanus’s rise and fall as an informing machine. Naming Tacitus does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 0116-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.
If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorTacitus
- contributed toFactAnnals 1–6 narrate Tiberius’s maiestas prosecutions and Sejanus’s rise and fall as an informing machine
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Annals 1–6 narrate Tiberius’s maiestas prosecutions and Sejanus’s rise and fall as an informing machine. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/tac-sejanus-maiestas
https://factrail.ai/facts/tac-sejanus-maiestas
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.