Skip to content
DriverOngoing causal factorinstitutional

Anti-corruption enforcement capacity

The sustained intensity of credible, institutionalized anti-corruption enforcement: independent specialized bureaus and prosecutors, transparent procurement, merit-based hiring, e-government that removes discretionary contact points, and political will to prosecute high-level officials. Higher intensity strengthens control of corruption and pushes CPI scores up. Its strongest welfare pathway: it strengthens Corruption Perceptions Index — Georgia, a better welfare reading.

Belgrade, Slavija Square: On December 22, 2024, a large anti-government protest took place after the railway station's canopy collapsed on November 1, killing 15 people. Photo: Stefan Miljuš, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Protest_Trg_Slavija_22._dec_VOA.jpg).
Read the full background

The sustained intensity of credible, institutionalized anti-corruption enforcement: independent specialized bureaus and prosecutors, transparent procurement, merit-based hiring, e-government that removes discretionary contact points, and political will to prosecute high-level officials. Higher intensity strengthens control of corruption and pushes CPI scores up.

What it changes

Indicators this driver moves, strongest relation first. Relation strength is separate from the observed state.

  • Strengthens · 80% impact strength

    Observed

    50 index score (0-100) · at the normal line (Dec 2025)

    At normal

    Above normal = better · Relation verified

  • Strengthens · 60% impact strength

    Observed

    42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (Dec 2025)

    Worse than normal

    Above normal = better · Lag ~37 mo · Relation verified

  • Strengthens · 40% impact strength

    Observed

    0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)

    Worse than normal

    Above normal = better · Lag ~24 mo · Relation verified

  • Strengthens · 30% impact strength

    Observed

    0.57 index score (0-1) · 0.23 below the normal line (2024)

    Worse than normal

    125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.5 index score (0-1) to 0.57 index score (0-1).

    Above normal = better · Lag ~24 mo · Relation verified

Key facts moving this driver

Ranked by impact weight, then verification, then recency.

Accountability & contradictions

A view of the graph: opposing facts, the actors behind them, and what is disputed.

Driver over time

The dated facts recorded on this driver, oldest first.

Causal path

Facts move the driver; the driver moves indicators. Open the full network to inspect each link.

  1. Facts15 recorded
  2. moveDriverAnti-corruption enforcement capacity
  3. strengthensIndicators (4)Corruption Perceptions Index — Georgia

Evidence

Review status of the facts behind this driver.

Review status · 15 factsReviewed 15

Documented Oct 2003 – Mar 2026

How Factrail grades evidence

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 15

Questions

Who is responsible for Anti-corruption enforcement capacity?

Factrail's graph links Roberta Metsola to Anti-corruption enforcement capacity through sourced facts.

When did Anti-corruption enforcement capacity start?

31 October 2003: UN adopts the Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC).