Skip to content
eventVerified

Mawangdui tomb 3 yields silk manuscripts of two Laozi recensions

In 1973 excavators of Mawangdui tomb 3 at Changsha recovered silk manuscripts including two Laozi recensions later labelled A and B, with de chapters before dao in one ordering. The tomb occupant is a Han marquis’s kin, not Laozi. In the causal graph this event sets in motion Digital Learning Access, a driver that weakens Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries) — an improving welfare path.

Sources: [1][2]

Read the full account

In 1973 excavators of Mawangdui tomb 3 at Changsha recovered silk manuscripts including two Laozi recensions later labelled A and B, with de chapters before dao in one ordering. The tomb occupant is a Han marquis’s kin, not Laozi.

Context

Before 1973 the received Wang Bi and Heshanggong lines dominated. Silk books showed a living Han text-family. They do not prove a single Spring and Autumn author. They do prove that a Laozi corpus circulated as a book by the early Han.

Laozi is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.

Why it matters

Knowledge-access path. High confidence on the excavation, high on the limit that this is not a signed sixth-century file.

A silk book is not a biography.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Laozi

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.25 · verified

    The heading is the received Laozi. The silk books are Han-tomb objects published by modern archaeology.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — LaoziStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Hunan Museum — Mawangdui holdings portalHunan Museum · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Hunan Museum holds and exhibits the Mawangdui silk books. The Stanford Laozi entry treats the find as a primary modern witness and keeps the authorship problem open.

Established: two silk Laozi texts were excavated at Mawangdui in 1973.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here. Confidence is stated on the impact path.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorLaozi
  2. contributed toFactMawangdui tomb 3 yields silk manuscripts of two Laozi recensions
  3. sets in motionDriverDigital Learning Access
  4. weakensIndicatorLearning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Mawangdui tomb 3 yields silk manuscripts of two Laozi recensions. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/lz-mawangdui-silk-1973

https://factrail.ai/facts/lz-mawangdui-silk-1973

Accessed 15 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.