Robert G. Henricks publishes an English Te-Tao Ching from the Mawangdui silks
In 1989 Henricks issued a complete English based on the Mawangdui recensions, with the de/dao order visible to non-specialists. Henricks publishes an English Te-Tao Ching from the Mawangdui silks (1989-01-01). In the causal graph this event strengthens Digital Learning Access, a driver that weakens Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries) — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1989 Henricks issued a complete English based on the Mawangdui recensions, with the de/dao order visible to non-specialists.
Henricks publishes an English Te-Tao Ching from the Mawangdui silks (1989-01-01).
Context
Translation after excavation is a separate public act from the find. It is how most English readers met the silk variants. Authorship remains unproven.
Laozi is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
A 1989 book is not a 1973 shovel. Split the instruments.
A 1989 book is not a 1973 shovel. Split the instruments.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Laozi
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.28 · verified
Traditional heading of the Daodejing plus later editors, excavators, temples, or states. Complex, not an autograph.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactRobert G. Henricks publishes an English Te-Tao Ching from the Mawangdui silks
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicators (3)Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 January 1989 · verified
A 1989 book is not a 1973 shovel. Split the instruments.
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.4)
Observed
70% of 10-year-olds · 70 above the normal line (2022)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 57% of 10-year-olds (2019) and 70% of 10-year-olds (2022).
20192022 Above normal = worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.35)
Observed
472 PISA score points · 28 below the normal line (2022)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2003–2022: fell from 499 PISA score points to 472 PISA score points.
Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.12 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.3)
Observed
11% of primary-school-age children · 11 above the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalAbove normal = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Columbia University Press — Asian studies listColumbia University Press · High credibility · verified
- 2.Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — LaoziInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Robert G. Henricks publishes an English Te-Tao Ching from the Mawangdui silks (1989-01-01). Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorLaozi
- contributed toFactRobert G. Henricks publishes an English Te-Tao Ching from the Mawangdui silks
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicatorLearning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Robert G. Henricks publishes an English Te-Tao Ching from the Mawangdui silks. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/lz-henricks-mawangdui-1989
https://factrail.ai/facts/lz-henricks-mawangdui-1989
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.