Taiwan enacts the Anti-Infiltration Act
On 31 December 2019 Taiwan enacted the Anti-Infiltration Act targeting PRC political donations and campaign interference. In the causal graph this event weakens Democratic Resilience, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
On 31 December 2019 Taiwan enacted the Anti-Infiltration Act targeting PRC political donations and campaign interference.
Context
The LY passed it. She promulgated. Opposition called it a green-terror chill. A statute is still a dated civic-space-and-security instrument.
CTi licence fight is a neighbouring later media row. 2020 re-election is the neighbouring later mandate.
The president of the Republic of China (Taiwan) is head of state under the Additional Articles. She does not write a PRC statute, a US NDAA, a TSMC board minute, or a 2026 Lai cabinet order. She left office on 20 May 2024; Lai Ching-te is president. A blackout is not a finding that every reactor was thereby safe. A Pelosi transit is not a PRC missile. Allegation of a stolen 2018 referendum is not stored as a completed steal. An indigenous apology is not a land-title gazette. A New Southbound brand is not an FTA by itself. A 2024 LY split is not a finding that the 2020 mandate was void.
Why it matters
The path is democratic resilience and digital-rights regulation: a completed anti-interference statute can raise election security and can chill lawful opposition speech.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Tsai Ing-wen
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.6 · verified
DPP LY majority passed. She promulgated. Courts apply. Opposition contested the chill.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactTaiwan enacts the Anti-Infiltration Act
- weakensDriverDemocratic Resilience
- strengthensIndicators (3)Having a say in government
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 31 December 2019 · verified
A completed anti-infiltration statute can contract lawful opposition space even when aimed at PRC interference.
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.28 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.7)
Observed
29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).
20212023 Above normal = better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)
Observed
0.53 score from 0 to 1 · 0.34 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.17 score from 0 to 1 to 0.53 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
- FactTaiwan enacts the Anti-Infiltration Act
- strengthensDriverDigital-Rights and Platform-Power Regulation
- strengthensIndicators (4)Alternative sources of information index
impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 31 December 2019 · verified
The Act is high-intensity political-speech regulation.
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.52)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.23 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.35 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)
Observed
45 Score · 45 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2018–2024: rose from 43.8 Score to 45 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.4)
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.12 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.35)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Reuters — Taiwan passes anti-infiltration law amid China tensionReuters · High credibility · verified
- 2.MOJ — Act for Implementation of J.Y. Interpretation No. 748, 17 May 2019Ministry of Justice Taiwan · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Ministry of Justice Taiwan carries the official instrument or communique. Reuters records the same dated act independently.
Established: a 31 December 2019 Anti-Infiltration Act, independently reported as passed and promulgated.
Not established: that every later opposition act was foreign, or a unique later conviction count from gazetting day.
She promulgated. Courts apply. Opposition contested the chill.. A later repeal, court stay, or successor order would be a different Fact with a different date. That pair identifies Taiwan enacts the Anti-Infiltration Act, not a later speech about Taiwan enacts the Anti-Infiltration Act.
Co-authors and later implementers named in Context remain on the file. If a later repeal, stay, or successor instrument exists, it needs its own date and its own row. The contribution described on this Person row is limited to DPP LY majority passed. She promulgated. Courts apply. Opposition contested the chill. That limit is the alternative to treating office-holding as authorship of every later series.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorTsai Ing-wen
- contributed toFactTaiwan enacts the Anti-Infiltration Act
- weakensDrivers (2)Democratic Resilience
- strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Taiwan enacts the Anti-Infiltration Act. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/tw-tsai-anti-infiltration-2019
https://factrail.ai/facts/tw-tsai-anti-infiltration-2019
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.