Skip to content
Adam Smith

Adam Smith

0

Near balanceFormula-derived score

Glasgow professor whose TMS, WN, and customs office reach the public through Gutenberg, Liberty Fund, SEP, and NLS. Documented harms: deskilling in WN, Company-state, customs post, classroom ‘invisible hand’. He did not typeset 1976.

Sympathy ethics as printed in TMSpolitical economy of markets and monopolies as printed in WNcustoms office as a later revenue post not a party label

Impact

Not rated yet: the verified records linked to this person, without a numeric impact.

Editorial assessment (context, not the score)

The page is not a marble liberal and not a unique author of 21st-century tax fights. The heaviest documented costs in public English are WN’s deskilling pages, the Company-state as described, and a customs office. The offsets are TMS, the printed WN as access, Book V education, and SEP honesty. He did not file 1976. Editors did that work. Confidence is high on those pages, medium on unique empire coefficients. Later edition pages remain the dated record.

Indicators affected

Indicators this person’s verified facts reach. No score contribution is assigned; the observed state is the indicator’s own reading.

Accountability & contradictions

Claims against the record, the type of responsibility, and what is disputed.

Claimed

What could change this assessment

  • 6 linked facts have no assessed welfare direction yet.
  • Lifetime coverage has not been assessed: the record reflects stored facts only (1740–1790).

Causal path

Person → Fact → Driver → Indicator. Select a path to inspect its factors; the full network opens on demand.

Timeline

The most relevant dated facts, newest first.

Evidence & methodology

How the record is sourced and how the score is derived.

26 of 26 linked facts verified, drawing on 8 distinct sources (1740–1790).

Sources include Encyclopaedia Britannica, Project Gutenberg, University of Glasgow, Royal Society of Edinburgh, The Royal Society, Liberty Fund, University of Oxford.

The score is formula-derived (Factrail formula v1, version 1.0.0), not an editorial verdict. Read the methodology.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 8

Expert analysis

An excerpt; the full analysis opens on request.

The first fact about Adam Smith in a public catalog is Book V’s stupefaction warning and a customs salary, not a marble market. Gutenberg WN at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300 (opens in a new tab) prints pin-making and then the mental mutilation of the specialised labourer, with parish education as a proposed remedy. SEP at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/smith-moral-political/ (opens in a new tab) and https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/smith-political-economy/ (opens in a new tab) warn against slogan Smith. Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Adam-Smith (opens in a new tab) prints the 1778 customs commission. TMS at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/67363 (opens in a new tab) prints sympathy inside an 18th-century household. Glasgow at https://www.gla.ac.uk/ (opens in a new tab) is a tobacco-era university as later heritage tells it. Liberty Fund’s Glasgow Edition at https://www.libertyfund.org/books/adam-smith/ (opens in a new tab) is a 1976-and-after critical machine. The offsets are also URLs. TMS’s impartial spectator is a cohesion craft. NLS at https://www.nls.uk/ (opens in a new tab) and Panmure House at https://www.panmurehouse.org/ (opens in a new tab) are access. Cambridge Companion pages supply limits. NPG at https://www.npg.org.uk/ (opens in a new tab) is a public face. What the score must not say: that he invented a modern party; that customs work cancels WN; that ‘invisible hand’ is the book; that 1776 HTML is a first edition. Complex contribution is the honest type. Confidence is high on TMS/WN as public books and on the customs date, medium on unique Company coefficients, low on unique tobacco profits. Related people are Hume, Hutcheson, Strahan, later editors. 1776 is a book. 1778 is an office. 1950 is a slogan. 1976 is an edition. The useful question is which later public pages still move deskilling, monopoly, and sympathy under his name. Keep TMS WN customs and SEP on separate dates. Later Loeb, UNESCO, and encyclopedia pages are evidence, not additional acts. Posthumous museums, critical editions, UNESCO listings, and political reception by later states are evidence, not additional acts. Related 2024–2025 news about COP, NATO, or a German chancellorship is not a relation.

Dispute a fact on this pageNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.