Gruner publishes an English Book I of the Canon, opening the text beyond Latin faculties
Gruner’s 1930 treatise is also an access instrument: Book I in English, later scanned. Readers without Latin could check what faculties had locked. In the causal graph this event strengthens Digital Learning Access, a driver that weakens Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries) — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
Gruner’s 1930 treatise is also an access instrument: Book I in English, later scanned. The dated book is London’s. Avicenna did not English it. Readers without Latin could check what faculties had locked.
Context
The same volume prints venesection. Split that harm. High confidence on publication.
Avicenna is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
A 1930 English Book I is a knowledge-access gain, not a licence for depletion.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Avicenna
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.28 · verified
Named physician-philosopher as heading of later editions, faculties, and commemorations. Printers, faculties, and agencies publish the instrument.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactGruner publishes an English Book I of the Canon, opening the text beyond Latin faculties
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicators (3)Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
impact weight 0.45 · Effect from 1 January 1930 · verified
A 1930 English Book I is a knowledge-access gain, not a licence for depletion.
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.4)
Observed
70% of 10-year-olds · 70 above the normal line (2022)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 57% of 10-year-olds (2019) and 70% of 10-year-olds (2022).
20192022 Above normal = worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.35)
Observed
472 PISA score points · 28 below the normal line (2022)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2003–2022: fell from 499 PISA score points to 472 PISA score points.
Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.3)
Observed
11% of primary-school-age children · 11 above the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalAbove normal = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.James Lind Library — Ibn Sina’s Canon: rules for assessing the effects of drugsJames Lind Library · High credibility · verified
- 2.Gruner, A Treatise on the Canon of Medicine of Avicenna (1930) — scanInternet Archive · High credibility · verified
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorAvicenna
- contributed toFactGruner publishes an English Book I of the Canon, opening the text beyond Latin faculties
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicatorLearning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Gruner publishes an English Book I of the Canon, opening the text beyond Latin faculties. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/av-gruner-english-access-1930
https://factrail.ai/facts/av-gruner-english-access-1930
Accessed 15 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.