Skip to content
Avicenna

Avicenna

0

Near balanceFormula-derived score

Physician-philosopher of the eastern Islamic courts whose Canon of Medicine and Book of Healing survive in later Latin incunables, the 1593 Medicean Arabic, Gruner’s English Book I, NLM and Wellcome witnesses, and UNESCO listings. The most recent verified record is “Gruner’s Canon prints pulse lore as a public heading later used as forensic certainty” (1 January 1930), linked to the driver Judicial Independence.

Galenic-Avicennian humoral canon as university lawprophet-legislator metaphysicslater UNESCO-and-print reception of a court physician

Impact

Not rated yet: the verified records linked to this person, without a numeric impact.

Editorial assessment (context, not the score)

The dossier is not a golden-age saint and not a cartoon bleeder. The heaviest documented costs in public English are humoral depletion and crisis-physiology, Italian faculty lock-in of the Latin Canon, expensive folios and exam guilds, court-first patronage, and prophet-legislator politics. The offsets are real and mostly editorial and methodological: 1473–1593 print, Wellcome and NLM witnesses, James Lind drug-rules, critical Latin, a Hebrew Canon, a 1954 museum-tomb, and a 2003 UNESCO ethics prize.

He did not file 1473 or 2003. Printers, faculties, and agencies did that work. Confidence is high on those acts and on the 1930 venesection heading, medium on later Unani-industrial branding and inoculation delay, low on reconstructing a lost case-notebook as a patient register.

Indicators affected

Indicators this person’s verified facts reach. No score contribution is assigned; the observed state is the indicator’s own reading.

Accountability & contradictions

Claims against the record, the type of responsibility, and what is disputed.

Claimed

What happened

Responsibility

What could change this assessment

  • 5 linked facts have no assessed welfare direction yet.
  • Lifetime coverage has not been assessed: the record reflects stored facts only (1473–2016).

Causal path

Person → Fact → Driver → Indicator. Select a path to inspect its factors; the full network opens on demand.

  1. PersonAvicenna
  2. FactThe Stanford Encyclopedia publishes a citable public English entry on Ibn Sina
  3. DriverDigital Learning Access
  1. PersonAvicenna
  2. FactSEP prints Avicenna’s prophet-legislator as the political peak of the Shifa
  3. DriverDemocratic Resilience
  1. PersonAvicenna
  2. FactSEP’s Ibn Sina and Ghazali entries print the later Avicennism-versus-kalam polarisation
  3. DriverPolitical Polarization

Timeline

The most relevant dated facts, newest first.

  1. 15 September 2016 · Digital Learning Access

    The Stanford Encyclopedia publishes a citable public English entry on Ibn Sina

  2. 15 September 2016 · Democratic Resilience

    SEP prints Avicenna’s prophet-legislator as the political peak of the Shifa

  3. 15 September 2016 · Political Polarization

    SEP’s Ibn Sina and Ghazali entries print the later Avicennism-versus-kalam polarisation

  4. 1 January 2007 · Health system capacity stress

    James Lind and PMC commentaries print the Canon’s observational rules as a case-writing method

  5. 1 January 2007 · Health system capacity stress

    The James Lind Library publishes Ibn Sina’s Canon rules for assessing the effects of drugs

  6. 1 January 2005 · Digital Learning Access

    UNESCO Memory of the World lists Canon-related medical manuscripts for conservation and access

Evidence & methodology

How the record is sourced and how the score is derived.

34 of 34 linked facts verified, drawing on 16 distinct sources (1473–2016).

Sources include Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, James Lind Library, UNESCO, Metropolitan Museum of Art, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Princeton University Press, SUNY Press, Brill.

Sources (showing 8 of 16)

  1. 1.Gruner, A Treatise on the Canon of Medicine of Avicenna (1930) — scanInternet Archive
  2. 2.Gohlman, The Life of Ibn Sina (SUNY)SUNY Press
  3. 3.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Ibn Sina [Avicenna]Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  4. 4.UNESCO Memory of the World — Medieval manuscripts on medicine and pharmacyUNESCO
  5. 5.James Lind Library — Ibn Sina’s Canon: rules for assessing the effects of drugsJames Lind Library
  6. 6.Siraisi, Avicenna in Renaissance Italy (Princeton)Princeton University Press
  7. 7.ISTC ia01417700 — Canon medicinae Latin, Rusch after Feb. 1473Consortium of European Research Libraries
  8. 8.UNESCO Avicenna Prize for Ethics in ScienceUNESCO

The score is formula-derived (Factrail formula v1, version 1.0.0), not an editorial verdict. Read the methodology.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 16

Expert analysis

An excerpt; the full analysis opens on request.

The first fact about Avicenna is a source limit. The richest Arabic is medieval and court-made; the richest dates a modern catalog can store without inventing an eleventh-century timestamp are later: Latin incunables, a Medicean Arabic press, English Book I, library catalogues, a Princeton faculty study, UNESCO files, and a Hamadan museum-tomb. Treating the Canon as a tape of 1025 is naive. Treating Avicennian medicine as only later abuse is evasive.

Gruner’s 1930 Canon Book I, scanned at https://archive.org/details/AvicennasCanonOfMedicine (opens in a new tab) , prints venesection, evacuation, and humoral crisis as ordinary therapy. The same physiology can be cited against preventive inoculation. Siraisi’s 1987 Princeton monograph at https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691601441/avicenna-in-renaissance-italy (opens in a new tab) documents Italian faculties that locked the Latin Canon into lectures and examinations, a teaching monopoly that crowded rival anatomy and chemistry. CERL’s ISTC at https://data.cerl.org/istc/ia01417700 (opens in a new tab) and https://data.cerl.org/istc/ia01418000 (opens in a new tab) shows how expensive those folios were. UNESCO’s 2005 Memory of the World file at https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world/medieval-manuscripts-medicine-and-pharmacy (opens in a new tab) lists Book II pharmacy manuscripts; a listed simple can be copied as a living recipe, including contested minerals. Gohlman’s 1974 Life at https://sunypress.edu/Books/T/The-Life-of-Ibn-Sina (opens in a new tab) prints a court physician’s household, patrons, imprisonments, and unfree surround. Stanford’s Ibn Sina entry, first published 15 September 2016 at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-sina/ (opens in a new tab) , with https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-sina-metaphysics/ (opens in a new tab) and https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/al-ghazali/ (opens in a new tab) , prints prophet-legislator politics and the later Avicennism-kalam polarisation.

The offsets are also dated. The 12 February 1473 Milan Latin Canon and the 1476 Padua Herbort folio put the encyclopedia into type. The 1593 Typographia Medicea Arabic, now at https://wellcomecollection.org/works/n94uwhrk (opens in a new tab) , is industrial policy for a scientific book. Wellcome MS Arabic 155 at https://wellcomecollection.org/works/wuwth5sx (opens in a new tab) is a complete 1632 Isfahan copy in a public-domain library. NLM’s 1994 exhibition page at https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/islamic_medical/islamic_07.html (opens in a new tab) and the exhibition home at https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/islamic_medical/islamic_00.html (opens in a new tab) teach the Canon as history of medicine, including a complete Arabic witness. The James Lind Library at https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/ibn-sinas-canon-of-medicine-11th-century-rules-for-assessing-the-effects-of-drugs/ (opens in a new tab) and the PMC twin at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2642865/ (opens in a new tab) print drug-assessment rules as an observational method heading. Van Riet’s Avicenna Latinus, from 1968, at https://brill.com/display/serial/ALAT (opens in a new tab) , is a critical-Latin factory. The 1954 Hamadan mausoleum-museum, as presented at https://www.visitiran.ir/en/attraction/tomb-of-avicenna (opens in a new tab) and in UNESCO’s 2004 ethics volume at https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000134475 (opens in a new tab) , is a public knowledge monument. The 2003 UNESCO Avicenna Prize at https://www.unesco.org/en/prizes/avicenna-prize-science-ethics (opens in a new tab) is an intergovernmental ethics instrument. Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Avicenna (opens in a new tab) and Iranica at https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/avicenna-index (opens in a new tab) independently frame the identity. The Met Heilbrunn book-arts essay at https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/book/hd_book.htm (opens in a new tab) opens the manuscript culture that carried the name.

What the score must not say: that Avicenna signed a 1473 colophon; that 1987 Siraisi is a 1025 lecture; that drug-testing rules are the Declaration of Helsinki; that venesection is only ‘of its time’ and therefore not a Fact; that a UNESCO prize washes depletion; that a unique modern casualty series can be back-dated without a measured argument. Complex contribution is the honest type. Confidence is high on 1473–2005 printings, catalogues, and agency acts, medium on later coefficients from humoral therapy onto any one clinic, low on reconstructing lost personal case-notes as a register.

1930 English is not 1025. 1473 is a printer. 1593 is a Medicean press. 2003 is UNESCO. Off-family indicator padding is refused. Related people are Greek medical ancestors, court patrons, Andalusian and Latin interlocutors, and later health-office holders who inherit a faculty vocabulary. They will be created as identities where missing.

The useful question is not whether Ibn Sina is the prince of physicians. It is which dated later instruments still move faculties, pharmacies, rights, and commemorations, and how much of that movement can be attributed to a Persian court name without invention.

Dispute a fact on this pageNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.