Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and companion criminal codes receive assent
On 25 December 2023 the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam received presidential assent, replacing the IPC, CrPC, and Evidence Act with effect from a later notified date in 2024. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
On 25 December 2023 the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam received presidential assent, replacing the IPC, CrPC, and Evidence Act with effect from a later notified date in 2024.
Context
The Home Ministry piloted the bills. Opposition walked out of parts of the debate. Modi is the prime minister of the government that enacted them. He did not sit as every magistrate.
UAPA 2019 is a neighbouring earlier security statute. Commencement in 2024 is a neighbouring later date.
The Prime Minister of India is head of the Union Council of Ministers. Parliament writes statutes; the President assents; states and Union ministries implement; the Supreme Court can strike a scheme down. A prime minister can announce demonetisation, drive a bill, and take an oath. He does not write a UNFCCC depositary record, an ISRO telemetry file, or a Supreme Court judgment by himself.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Narendra Modi
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.65 · verified
His government piloted the bills. Parliament passed them. The President assented. Courts and police still implement.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and companion criminal codes receive assent
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.45 · Effect from 25 December 2023 · verified
A completed criminal-code rewrite with expanded Union-priority offences is a dated change in due-process architecture.
- Worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.32 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.32 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.31 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Reuters — India overhauls colonial-era criminal lawsReuters · High credibility · verified
- 2.PIB — President gives assent to the three new criminal laws, 25 December 2023Press Information Bureau of India · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Press Information Bureau of India carries the official instrument or communique. Reuters records the same dated act independently.
Established: a 25 December 2023 presidential assent to three new criminal codes replacing IPC, CrPC, and the Evidence Act.
Not established: a unique later undertrial coefficient from Christmas Day, or that every colonial section vanished without successor.
Parliament passed them. The President assented. Courts and police still implement.. A later repeal, court stay, or successor order would be a different Fact with a different date. That pair identifies Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and companion criminal codes receive assent, not a later speech about Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and companion criminal codes receive assent.
Co-authors and later implementers named in Context remain on the file. If a later repeal, stay, or successor decree exists, it needs its own date and its own row. The contribution described on this Person row is limited to His government piloted the bills. Parliament passed them. The President assented. Courts and police still implement. That limit is the alternative to treating office-holding as authorship of every later series. The Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, the President, the Reserve Bank, state governments, the Election Commission, and foreign counterparties share specific files. Allegation is not a completed judgment. A Supreme Court striking-down is not a criminal conviction. A scheme notification is not a unique rupee coefficient. A UN pledge is not a delivered emissions path.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorNarendra Modi
- contributed toFactBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and companion criminal codes receive assent
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and companion criminal codes receive assent. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/in-new-criminal-codes-2023
https://factrail.ai/facts/in-new-criminal-codes-2023
Accessed 15 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.