Skip to content
law adoptionVerified

Referendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030

On 20–22 April 2019 Egypt held a referendum on constitutional amendments. In the causal graph this event weakens Electoral Integrity and Competitiveness, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Referendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030

Sources: [1][2]

Read the full account

On 20–22 April 2019 Egypt held a referendum on constitutional amendments. The National Election Authority recorded 88.8 percent yes and 44.3 percent turnout. The package extends presidential terms from four to six years, extends Sisi’s then-current term, and allows a further term toward 2030, while expanding presidential power over judicial appointments and the military’s constitutional role.

Context

Parliament had passed the amendments on 16 April 2019 (531 of 596). He did not need to author every clause to benefit from the transitional article. Turnout and yes-share are NEA figures.

16 April parliamentary vote; 20–22 April referendum; 23–24 April NEA announcement. Stored as one April 2019 Fact. Keep Referendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030 on 2019-04-23 separate from neighbouring coup, Rab’a, referendum, and 2023-return instruments.

The president of Egypt is head of state and supreme commander. In 2013 he was defence minister and deputy prime minister for security. He can announce an ouster, command a dispersal, and accept an NEA return. He does not write an HRW investigation, an IMF board minute, or a unique Rab’a integer invented here.

Why it matters

The path is electoral integrity: a completed term-clock reset toward 2030.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Direct responsibility

    verified

    He is the incumbent who gained the extra term. Parliament voted. NEA tabulated. Sharing tabulation is not a reason to drop the reset.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactReferendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030
    2. weakensDriverElectoral Integrity and Competitiveness
    3. strengthensIndicators (3)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 1 · Effect from 23 April 2019 · verified

    A completed referendum that extends the incumbent’s clock is a dated weakening of electoral rotation.

    1. FactReferendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030
    2. strengthensDriverSisi post-2013 military presidency
    3. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 1 · Effect from 23 April 2019 · verified

    A completed 2019 term-clock reset toward 2030 is a dated strengthening of the post-2013 military presidency.

    • Weakens · Relationship strength 0.8 (weight 1 × strength 0.8)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.BBC — NEA records 88.8 percent yes, 44.3 percent turnout, 24 April 2019BBC News · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Ahram Online — House of Representatives passes constitutional amendments, 16 April 2019Ahram Online · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Ahram Online carries the official instrument or communique. BBC News records the same dated act independently.

Established: NEA recorded 88.8 percent yes and 44.3 percent turnout. The amendments extend terms to six years and allow a further Sisi term toward 2030.

Not established: A unique later GDP coefficient from the reset, or that 88.8 percent is an ODIHR competitive finding.

Parliament voted. NEA tabulated. Sharing tabulation is not a reason to drop the reset.. A later repeal, court stay, or successor order would be a different Fact with a different date. That pair identifies Referendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030, not a later speech about Referendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030.

Co-authors and later implementers named in Context remain on the file. If a later repeal, stay, or successor instrument exists, it needs its own date and its own row. The contribution described on this Person row is limited to He is the incumbent who gained the extra term. Parliament voted. NEA tabulated. That limit is the alternative to treating office-holding as authorship of every later series.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorAbdel Fattah el-Sisi
  2. contributed toFactReferendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030
  3. weakensDrivers (2)Electoral Integrity and Competitiveness
  4. strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Referendum approves amendments resetting Sisi’s term clock toward 2030. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/eg-sisi-constitution-2019

https://factrail.ai/facts/eg-sisi-constitution-2019

Accessed 15 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.