Skip to content
Diogenes of Sinope

Diogenes of Sinope

0

Near balanceFormula-derived score

Cynic philosopher of Sinope (conventional fourth century BCE) whose public English is mostly Diogenes Laertius Book 6 in Hicks 1925. Documented harms: late anecdotal Life as if a register; lantern and Alexander as later printed; coin-defacement murky versus numismatic adulteration; 1975 Diogenes syndrome as a misnomer. He did not typeset 1925.

Cynic askesis and shamelessness as later printed anecdote rather than as a verified diarynature over empty custom as a school heading in Hicks not as a statuteworld-citizenship as a saying later reused as slogan or as a modest belonging-claim

Impact

Not rated yet: the verified records linked to this person, without a numeric impact.

Editorial assessment (context, not the score)

The page is not a recovered lamp and not a geriatric clinic. The heaviest documented costs in public English are a late anecdotal Life, lantern and Alexander as printed legend, a mixed coin-identity file, shamelessness and slave anecdotes, a 1975 misnomer, and a mascot statue. The offsets are real and mostly late: Hicks/Perseus access, IEP/SEP flags, numismatic-limit pages, and later medical reviews that exonerate the heading. He did not file 1925 or 1975. Compilers, editors, and clinicians did that work. Confidence is high on those pages, medium on cosmopolitan and physis signs, low on any unique coefficient from a lantern to a modern series.

Indicators affected

Indicators this person’s verified facts reach. No score contribution is assigned; the observed state is the indicator’s own reading.

Accountability & contradictions

Claims against the record, the type of responsibility, and what is disputed.

What could change this assessment

  • 3 linked facts have no assessed welfare direction yet.
  • Lifetime coverage has not been assessed: the record reflects stored facts only (0323–0359).

Causal path

Person → Fact → Driver → Indicator. Select a path to inspect its factors; the full network opens on demand.

Timeline

The most relevant dated facts, newest first.

Evidence & methodology

How the record is sourced and how the score is derived.

20 of 20 linked facts verified, drawing on 5 distinct sources (0323–0359).

Sources include Encyclopaedia Britannica, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Perseus Digital Library / Tufts.

The score is formula-derived (Factrail formula v1, version 1.0.0), not an editorial verdict. Read the methodology.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 5

Expert analysis

An excerpt; the full analysis opens on request.

The first fact about Diogenes of Sinope in a public catalog is a late book, not a recovered lamp. Hicks 1925 (https://archive.org/details/livesofeminentph02dioguoft (opens in a new tab) and Loeb https://www.loebclassics.com/view/LCL185/1925/volume.xml (opens in a new tab)) and Perseus Book 6 (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0258:book=6:chapter=2 (opens in a new tab)) are the dated English of an anecdotal Life. IEP at https://iep.utm.edu/diogenes-of-sinope/ (opens in a new tab) and SEP Cynics at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cynics/ (opens in a new tab) independently treat Diogenes Laertius as late and mixed. Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Diogenes-of-Sinope (opens in a new tab) is a general-reader door. The lantern and the Alexander sunlight scene (Perseus Plutarch Alexander 14 at https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plut.+Alex.+14 (opens in a new tab) and Harvard Lives VII at https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674991101 (opens in a new tab)) are later printed, not verified mornings. Shamelessness anecdotes are printed, not case-files. Manes is a named slave in the vita. Coin-defacement: IEP states numismatic evidence that Sinopean coinage was adulterated, while Diocles versus Eubulides versus a Pordalus confession cannot stably name who did it. Kosmopolites can be an empty exit. Nature-over-nomos can sideline a bench. Begging is theatre. The dog heading can dehumanise. Lost titles are a false library. The 1975 eponym is a later medical instrument. PubMed’s Lancet record (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/47497/ (opens in a new tab)) names ‘Diogenes syndrome’. PMC reviews at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3553571/ (opens in a new tab) and https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2277810/ (opens in a new tab) independently call the reference misleading and record the plea to exonerate the philosopher. He did not author a geriatric squalor clinic. The offsets are URLs with later dates. IEP and SEP flag legend. Perseus and Archive scans open the vita. Cologne’s Römisch-Germanisches Museum at https://roemisch-germanisches-museum.de/en (opens in a new tab) displays a mosaic type as a limited door, not a face. A 2006 Sinop statue sits in a civic-tourism neighbourhood of the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism (https://www.ktb.gov.tr/ (opens in a new tab)) beside Britannica’s Sinope identity — a mascot and, on a split row, a local education object. Cambridge’s political-thought neighbourhood at https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-greek-and-roman-political-thought/ (opens in a new tab) is a classroom file. British Library Greek manuscripts at https://www.bl.uk/greek-manuscripts (opens in a new tab) are the medieval path, not a fourth-century autograph. IEP Cynics at https://iep.utm.edu/cynics/ (opens in a new tab) places the school. What the score must not say: that the lantern is a dated act; that Alexander’s sunlight is a dispatch; that he defaced a named issue; that 1975 is his diagnosis; that a mosaic is his face; that kosmopolites is a UN covenant; that pithos is a recovered house. Complex contribution is the honest type. Confidence is high on editions and medical flags, medium on cosmopolitan and physis signs, low on unique modern indicator coefficients. 1925 is not 350. 1975 is not a pithos. 2006 is not a likeness. Hostile vita slander is not upgraded. Off-family indicator padding is refused. Related people are Socrates as an insecure ancestry-heading, Antisthenes as an insecure teacher-heading, Plato as later insult-pair, Alexander as later anecdote, Crates and Zeno as transmission headings, Epicurus as a rival Hellenistic school in later files, Cicero as later Latin reception, Plutarch as the Alexander-carrier, Diogenes Laertius as compiler. The useful question is which later public pages still move knowledge, polarisation, and civic staffing under this name without inventing agora mornings.

Dispute a fact on this pageNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.