In February 2025 Google removed language from its public AI Principles committing not to build AI for weapons or violating surveillance, a completed rollback under Pichai. Neighbouring 2018 Principles and Maven are the prior constraint. Neighbouring Pentagon 2026 is later deal. Brin’s ‘nanny products’ note is neighbouring founder weather. He did not write a DoD FAR clause. AI Principles June 2018 is neighbouring original PDF. Maven 2018 is neighbouring prior exit. Pentagon Gemini April 2026 is later contract. Sundar Pichai has been CEO of Google since 10 August 2015 and of Alphabet since 3 December 2019. He does not write a Sherman Act complaint, a Commission DMA article, a CAC circular, or a Pentagon contract clause by himself as a civil servant. A keynote is not a completed breakup. A liability opinion is not a Chrome sale. A layoff round is not a unique unemployment coefficient as his personal tally. TPU trains; TSMC and partners fabricate; App Review analogues on Play enforce. Keep those dates separate. An AI Principle PDF is not a completed weapons ban. A settlement is not a verdict. Larry Page is a different person. Sergey Brin is a different person. Google carries the official instrument or communique. The Verge records the same dated act independently. The path is ai-regulation-intensity: a completed pledge rollback is a weapons-AI reopening instrument. Established: February 2025 AI Principles rollback, independently reported. Not established: that every later Gemini answer became a weapon, or a unique later casualty coefficient from the diff. What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, a later repeal, a court that vacated the instrument, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions. The date is the date of this instrument, not a licence to back-date every later harm or benefit. Policy teams edited. Employees later objected. DoD sat as a neighbouring customer.. A later repeal, court stay, or successor order would be a different Fact with a different date. That pair identifies Google removes weapons-and-surveillance pledges from its AI Principles, not a later speech about Google removes weapons-and-surveillance pledges from its AI Principles. Co-authors and later implementers named in Context remain on the file. Google removes weapons-and-surveillance pledges from its AI Principles on 2025-02-04 is not a licence to treat every later Google communique as this same act. If a later repeal, stay, or successor instrument exists, it needs its own date and its own row. This dossier refuses to average Google removes weapons-and-surveillance pledges from its AI Principles into a personality. The contribution described on this Person row is limited to He was CEO of the page’s issuer. Policy teams edited. Employees later objected. DoD sat as a neighbouring customer. That limit is the alternative to treating office-holding as authorship of every later series.